But those numbers were obtained by a completley different methodology. 
As far as I understand, Sean is looking at the *digital* S/PDIF signal
at the coax digital out of the SB.  I'm not sure what the test signal
is.  The pk-pk value is then the distance between the earliest and
latest clock transition, in other words the width of the jitter
distribution at its base.  A better (for several good statistical
reasons) number to look at is the rms value.  The two are consistent
(to within the error) with the jitter being random Gaussian noise.

Stereophile, on the other hand, is playing a pure test tone and then
looking at the *analogue* outputs of a DAC.  Jitter will induce
sidebands to the input tone, but this is a very complicated process
involving many elements other than just the transport (like cables,
DAC, etc.).  Furthermore I think it won't see some types of jitter at
all (for example it would miss at least some of the correlated jitter
effects, like those that distort the frequency response by changing the
amplitude of the primary tone but don't induce sidebands).  Also I don't
see how you can extract the numbers Sean measured from the analogue
signal without some fairly elaborate algorithm - probably one that
essentially performs an A->D on the signal, which will again introduce
errors (including more jitter!) that have nothing to do with the
transport.

And one last point - I poked around a little and saw that there are
different conventions in the literature for what peak-peak means.  It's
possible it's sometimes defined with a factor of two relative to Sean's
definition, so that it measures the distance from the *center* to the
edge of the distribution.  That would mean you should divide Sean's
numbers by 2 to compare (to be clear I'm not saying that's the case - I
don't know - but it's a natural definition, and it's clear from the
little I read that there is some confusion over conventions).

So I simply don't think you can compare, at least not until Stereophile
reviews the SB or Sean gets hold of a player they've already reviewed.


-- 
opaqueice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25188

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to