pfarrell Wrote: 
> P Floding wrote:
> > pfarrell Wrote: 
> >>Especially since the jitter problem is just fiction to make
> >>people spend money.
> >>I can believe it was a real problem decades ago. I see nothing
> >>to indicate that any recent audiophile equipment has any audible 
> >>differences any more.
> 
> > Decades ago?
> > Why don't all transports sound the same then?
> > Or was it just a flamestarter?
> 
> Not an attempt to flame at all, which you should be
> able to tell from my prior postings.
> 
> I just do not believe that jitter is a serious problem anymore.
> 
> I don't know what a transport is. Except for a very few (count them on
> one hand) all the CD/DVD/SACD players use commodity PC transports.
> It is unreasonable to expect that different brands using the same
> parts would have different sounds.
> 
> Last month's The Absoute Sound raved about a CD player that
> costs $33,000. It is beyond my understanding how it could be even
> three times better than a $10,000 CD player.
> 
> All CD/DVD/SACD players pull bits from the plastic disk.
> Bits are bits. Perhaps there is a difference in how they read,
> focus lengths, ECC, etc. But I doubt it.
> 
> There are different DAC chips out there. Some are really expensive and
> cost as much as $10 each. Probably sonic differences there.
> 
> And the analog signal paths can have impact on sound. No argument
> there,
> unless someone can implement straight wire with gain.
> 
> But if you are talking about extracting bits from the plastic disk
> and transporting it to a DAC (external or internal), I don't see
> how any sort of transport has any impact on sound.
> 
> When the digital signal has proper ECC, there is nothing you
> can do to change the bits. That is one of the solid beauties
> of being digital.
> 
> And for stereo, with modern systems, I don't see that jitter is a 
> problem. Clock skew is a big problem in multi-channel recording
> studios,
> because you have more channels of signal than you can have on a two 
> channel ADC. So there is lots of potential for clock skew causing
> all sorts of evil stuff. The solution for that is a master clock
> driving
> all the ADCs, and any number of vendors will gladly sell you
> a clock, and all pro recording gear has clock inputs.
> 
> For SqueezeBox to DAC to amp to speakers, in stereo, I just don't see 
> it. I don't see credible reasons for it in the audiophile
> magazines, I don't see any engineering reason for it.
> 
> And I sure don't see any reason to spend my hard earned money on a 
> problem that doesn't seem to be real.
> 
> YMMV.
> 
> If you want to talk about 24 bit samples at high sample rates,
> I can totally believe that there is an audible difference.
> But the industry completely screwed up SACD and DVD-A to the
> point that no one cares about them, and transports that support them
> are
> becoming fewer. And major artists' labels are not releasing material on
> 
> them. So high-wide, while wonderful, is like vinyl -- a niche product
> for a tiny subset of audiophiles. high-wide could have finally killed
> vinyl, but it failed.
> 
> -- 
> Pat Farrell         PRC recording studio
> http://www.pfarrell.com/PRC

Why don't you start a new thread for ranting about your various
beliefs, instead? You certainly seem less than up-to-date on the
subject of digital audio technology.


-- 
P Floding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26332

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to