CFP Wrote: > I thought it was because they were still trying to compensate for > certain deficiencies of analog recording when it was unneeded for > digital. > > > > So how is this different than any other piece of computer hardware? > Minus of course, the dedicated "FLAC Machine" with gate logic solely > optimized for FLAC algorithm decoding :P > > edit: Going through the hardware specs I see the SB3 has a 250mhz > processor. I'm pretty sure that's enough to decode FLAC - one of the > fastest decoding formats - without straining too much under the labor.
If you are going to be a sceptic, then at the very least learn to read carefully and apply logic. "no-one can claim the situations are fully equivalent" is all I said. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26332 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
