CardinalFang;143005 Wrote: > My guess is what they've built is a filter that spatialises stereo by > using a comb filter or HRT transforms then does some reverb and other > filtering to make it sound impressive. It ends up being very tiring to > listen to and a novelty to be played back through crappo PC speakers. I > have used similar systems before on mobile phones and for VR that claim > to enhance movies, music and games, but after the initial impression of > a wider sound stage, you realise that it's the same music but sounding > like it's in a big bucket. > > I do like the graph though. I'd love to see how it gets presented at > shows or in a sales pitch. "Listeners reported a 50% increase in > 'experience' compared to ordinary stereo, and 10% recorded a full Jimi > Hendrix". > > I may do my own for my music library, perhaps using a scale from mildly > entertained, through moderately enchanted to extremely captivated. Units > of percentage satisfaction should suffice.
The problem is that most people (99%?) have never heard an even half-decent system, and think that anything that sounds a bit different to their crappy stuff is fantastic. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28260 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
