opaqueice;153839 Wrote: > The next question is whether the Lavry (which I use as an example > because it's the only one I've read the white paper for) accomplishes > this as well. What they do is use a CPU to check the state of the > buffer. If it's getting full, they increase the speed of the clock > (which controls the output); if it's emptying out they decrease it. > This keeps the buffer around half full all the time. They make this > (tiny) adjustment every ten seconds or so for a typical timing > mismatch. Doesn't this do exactly the same as a PLL with a bandwidth of 0.1Hz?
-- cliveb Performers -> dozens of mixers and effects -> clipped/hypercompressed mastering -> you think a few extra ps of jitter matters? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29450 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
