I think some of the debates get very close in nature to some of the
creationism discussions - "since there are gaps in the fossil records,
evolution is flawed", goes the argument, a kind of reverse proof based
on destroying alternative rather than providing evidence. Or in audio
terms, since there are things that it doesn't seem possible to measure
yet, engineering theory is flawed and you should just use your ears.

Everyone will have their own point of view on whether someone selling a
product should prove the effectiveness of that product, but my view is
that we tend to get more or less bothered by the lack of evidence
according to our own backgrounds, such as whether we are engineers or
studied science at college or come from an arts or creative background
(why you can't be good at both I don't know, Leonardo DaVinci seemed to
have a grasp on scienec and art)

Myself, I get irritated by products like Bybees and expensive cables
because as someone with a physics background, the poor science is
almost an insult to people who have studied hard and made genuine
discoveries. When someone then compounds it by saying "but engineering
just isn't good enough yet to measure how they work", my feeling is
that it may well be true that accuracy may not be there or the test
hasn't been devised yet, but that doesn't excuse not trying if you are
in a position to do so. I do wish I'd been able to use that line during
my finals though, it would have saved me a ton of work.

At the same time, I buy gear based on listening to it to see if it
excites me and pay scant attention to data sheets. Contrary I know, but
I do assume whoever built it engineered it correctly and it's good if it
is based on solid science because it means it that I have some respect
for the company and they aren't insulting my intelligence either. The
first sign of psuedo science and my money goes elsewhere.

At the end of the day, you are free to spend your money how you like,
but if you buy a product that is in any way "out there" and talk about
it on a forum, it seems you will invariably set off a stream of counter
views that generally start off by taking what what was previously said
to the extreme to make it seem idiotic rather than providing a point by
point considered response.


-- 
CardinalFang
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CardinalFang's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=962
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29972

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to