tomjtx;161677 Wrote: 
> I agree with MC but I don't mean this to answer for him.
> The TP has a great DAC . I haven't heard better. i've compared it to
> the Lavry DAC
> (which many like better than the Benchmark). 
> I like the TP better than the Lavry. I think the 2 are so close it may
> just be a matter of opinion.
> 
> IMO it would be a waste of money to use the TP to feed an external DAC
> since I don't think there is a DAC out there that is better.
> 
> If you want to use an external DAC you can save a lot by using it with
> an SB
> 
> If you want a TP for the looks, I would suggest you live with it a
> month, then compare it to other DACs.
> I would be surprised if you still wanted a stand alone DAC.
> 
> Let us know what you decide and what you hear in your comparisons,
> should be interesting and (hopefully) fun

SB3 doesnt have a wordclock input function. You can slave the
transporter to an external DAC to reduce jitter but this cant be done
with a SB3. Usually such dacs (i mean well implemented ones) come at a
higher premium than the larvy and benchmark


-- 
Konig
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konig's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8490
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30530

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to