totoro;169805 Wrote: > That seems like a pretty "objectivist" position to me :). The idea that > all objectivists think that if you can't measure it you can't hear it > is a canard. > > The position I, and I think others, take is: if you can't measure it, > you better be able to show that it can be distinguished in blind tests, > in order to make sure it's doing _something_. > > So I guess I agree with you.....
Ah, you caught me. What does an audio objectivist who does not concede that there are limits to our ability to objectively measure have in common with an audio subjectivist who does not concede that stated preferences remain unsubstantiated without reliable A/B differentiation? Each is a poor logician. :) -- jeffmeh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31533 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
