opaqueice;169972 Wrote: 
> Thanks for the response - that's very useful information.  
> 
> Do you have any thoughts on whether replacing the analogue crossover
> with a DEQX would improve the performance of the Orions even more?

The Orion analog crossover (ASP) is nearly ideally suited to the task. 
Substituting a DEQX would be a waste of money, IMO.  The lower-cost
DCX2496 could substitute for the Orion ASP, but the dipole baffle
compensation required for the bass is limited by the dynamic range of
the programmable filters on that unit.  Monte Kay used this
configuration for a while and was pleased with it, but ultimately
migrated back to the ASP.  

The only system change that has improved the Orions in my view is the
addition of surround channels.  I use a Meridian 561 to perform
Trifield decoding of CD sources, and this dramatically enhances the
sound field on instrumental music.  Presently, I augment with rear
channels only, but I'm building a center channel similar to the one
described by Linkwitz to fully explore the Trifield concept. 
Ultimately, when I finish my second set of Orions, I will set them up
as side channels to experience Trifield 7.0.  However, I doubt that
I'll retain that arrangement for long due to unacceptably low WAF.


-- 
jhenderson010759
------------------------------------------------------------------------
jhenderson010759's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=385
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31557

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to