opaqueice wrote:
> Pat Farrell;170266 Wrote: 
>> And you call yourself an audiophile?
>> Such  * <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heresy>*heresy.
>>
> 
> It's kind of fun, being a heretic... here are two (of an infinite
> number available) pieces of actual  evidence (!!) to support my
> heresy:
> 
> http://www.matrixhifi.com/contenedor_ppec_eng.htm
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/browse_frm/thread/664b8681ab141263/3fd91bcb6a1522a0?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dsunshine%2Bstereo%2Byamaha%2Babx%2Bnousaine%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D501fl6%2524ac3%2540oxy.rust.net%26rnum%3D1#3fd91bcb6a1522a0

While I don't entirely disagree with you (I use Rotel RB-850 power amps,
bought s/h from eBay for peanuts), I don't think an article and a
mailing list thread taken from the Internet constitutes particularly
reliable evidence.

My own feeling is that the "sweet spot" where the law of diminishing
returns kicks in is particularly low down the price/performance curve
for amplifiers and is particularly shallow after that point (i.e. the
price increases quickly, the performance doesn't.)

R.

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to