thomsens;175688 Wrote: > Am aware of all points - thanks. I think encoding is more appropriate > because all encoded music is actually compressed (the original > conversion to CD format throws away info just as MP3 does). My point > was more general, the example was MP3, but I'm sure they would have had > the same reaction if I had used FLAC and not lost a bit during the > conversions.
Why do you think that? (about FLAC) 16/44 is not "compressed". It is bandwidth limited. As is LP or any other format in existance. Lossy compression, such as mp3, is an ENTIRELY different animal! -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32232 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
