totoro;176613 Wrote: 
> Talking about whether this would even work, or there is any reason to
> believe that there is anything beyond placebo in any differences is
> actually pretty on target, I would say.
> 
> I could make the obverse argument: if we don't chime in on these
> tweaker discussions, this will turn into a forum for audio mystics, and
> any skepticism will be shouted down. 
> 
> All depends on your point of view. That's why we have discussions. See
> my earlier comment about presumption.

Let's just assume, for a minute, that oscillator crystals are indeed
quite microphonic. Of course, their long term accuracy would not be
affected as any microphony would just create ripples in the output
frequency -not affect the total number of osciallations per time unit.
However, the derived clock from such a crystal would carry a direct
imprint of the vibrations causing the microphony, in the form of time
modulation (jitter).

I don't find this explanation in the least bit implausible.

BTW, please let knowledgable DIY'ers that show up here have SOME
freedom to share their knowledge and speculate, and EVEN air some
subjective points of view! I for one would like to be able to discuss
modifications etc with people like Gary (who knows the SBs in and out,
I believe).
The "it must be ABX:ed" standard response will only drive everyone away
from here.

Rgds


-- 
P Floding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32301

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to