P Floding;177856 Wrote: > > Out of curiosity, what kind of change was it that you could apply > without interrupting anything? >
I'm not going to mention what the tweak was, because I don't want that to influence the discussion about testing methods. A couple of other points about this specific test: - In no instance did anyone raise their hand *before* I implemented the tweak. This includes the time I waited 40 seconds before implementing the tweak. - This is a group of audiophiles that I have done "eyes-closed" tests before, and in some instances have done a test where I didn't actually change anything; so this group knows that I have a history of trying to catch them hearing a change that doesn't exist. - What prompted me to do this particular test was after someone did a SBT with me, and I heard a difference. The explanation of how the tweak worked made no sense whatsover to me, so I wanted to see if others were hearing what I was hearing (and no, I did not discuss with them what to expect). - The track we played was a relatively quiet and intimate track; acoustic folk quartet (guitar, piano, drums, vocal). When the SBT was given to me, I could not detect the differences in more "busy" music (eg. up-tempo rock).... -- PhilNYC Sonic Spirits Inc. http://www.sonicspirits.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32466 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
