GaryB;180422 Wrote: 
> Let me start by welcoming Hirsch to the discussion.  I find his comments
> to be well reasoned and he articulates the objections to DBT much better
> than I ever could.

I sure didn't read Hirsch's comments as criticism of DBT. I read it as
an informed practitioner's discussion of nuances of methodology and
issues to consider. I believe he stated outright 

> 
> I have used DBT in pharmacology. I don't trust results without it.

He goes on to state how you have to handle the sizing so that it is
statistically significant and understand the limits of the testign
methdology. I agree. I think we could have a fascinating conversation
about the appropriateness of DBT or *other testing methodology*, but I
seriously doubt Hirsch is advocating the release of drugs into the
consumer world because one person reported they got better. If he is, I
misunderstood his posting completely, and do not agree. But I don't
think I did...

Interesting how we both could read the same posting and come to such
different viewpoints.


-- 
Eric Carroll

Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4
SB3-Rotel RB890-B&W Matrix 805
SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage OM7+C2+R2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Carroll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9293
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to