ezkcdude;180761 Wrote: > This complexity argument is pure sophistry. Scientists haven't debated > the basic theory of evolution for over a hundred years. So, this means > they must not have it right? Sure, climatology is a complex science. > But, the idea of man-made CO2 emmissions warming the atmosphere is > pretty basic, and the scientific community has reached a consensus that > it is indeed happening. The only thing that is still debated among > scientists is how much warming will there be, and what are the > potential effects of the warming. These are where the models come in, > and in that respect, I don't think a consensus has been reached. But to > deny that warming exists and is man-made, is just not a tenable > position.
The theory of evolution is debated all the time. And I don't mean from a religious standpoint, but in the details. I find it hard to think of anything in science that is not under continous scrutiny, and subject to modified views -even if the main concentration of research move around between subjects, letting some cool off for a while. -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
