pablolie;184112 Wrote: > Not sure why you would get flamed. Because I am touching on the great > subjectivist vs objectivist divide in audiophile land.
pablolie;184112 Wrote: > > I am always very scpetical when people claim something's based on > physics. There was a time when they could prove the sun circled the > earth with physics. :-) On the other hand, I don't think *everything* > needs to be measurable and quantifiable to be valid in an art as > esoteric as "high end audio", which is somewhat irrational to start > with. Well, we differ here. This isn't quantum mechanics. It isn't cosmology, string theory or general relativity. This is not X ray wave guides. We understand electronics at 20-50 KHz. We know alot about audio perception. There are still black art areas, like speaker design and a bit of room acoustics. But it is way less black art than people seem to believe. This topic is measurable. Anyway, I have said my piece on this and I will go back into my hole now. I really do know better... -- Eric Carroll Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4 SB3-Rotel RB890-B&W Matrix 805 SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage OM7+C2+R2 ReadyNAS NV+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Carroll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9293 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33146 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
