Eric Carroll;184333 Wrote: > AHA!!! I think we got hung up on language here then. Thank you for the > clarification. If I misunderstood your position I think it was due to > the language getting used in this discussion and its relationship to > Audiophile beliefs - you did the post on the Wiki page so perhaps you > understand what I mean here. When people say around here they don't > believe in listening tests, it generally means they do not accept the > scientific study of audibility and the engineering associated to that > or that their principles are very different than the "objectivist" > crowd. > > So, let me see if understand your question. If we took a signal, and > split it to run through a S/PDIF standard LED and plastic fibre, and > put the same signal through a 75ohm coax link, then looked at the > receiver end and measured one standard deviation of jitter, which would > be smaller?
Now look, you know full well that cable-induced jitter is related to the length of the cable and this is different for coax and toslink...so how are you going to compare apples with apples? -- Phil Leigh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33146 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
