pablolie;185888 Wrote: > That doesn't make sense. If the SB CPU couldn't keep up, drop-outs would > be the effect, not ever so slightly and subtly affected audio quality of > the "room resolution" type.
For the fourth and last time, this isn't about overloading the CPU - obviously that doesn't happen. It's about the increased load causing some sort of extra EMI. > > And *every* additional CPU load on the SB wuld result in compromised > sound quality. Use the remote, have the music sound worse for an > instant. The design is more resilient than that, we'd have far worse > problems is higher CPU load affected sound quality every time. > Moreover, there's not a single reason to assume WAVs cause lower CPU > util than FLAC, and they certifiably use up twice the bandwidth, which > taxes the transport path at another level. Thanks for summarizing my last four posts in this thread. > > Yeah, and it just so happens you are the sole authority when it comes > to bestowing the "reasonably well engineered" award, your posting > history betrays your supposed lack of bias sufficiently. I have no idea what you're talking about. This discussion is no longer worth continuing. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32999 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
