jmourik;188448 Wrote: > But wouldn't that be the same problem as bringing out a new model? You > just ordered the sb3, and a month later the new and improved sb4 > appears. Bummer... > Or they could launch a SB3 Cryo, for $325? >
I think you fell into Tyler's tongue-in-cheek trap. OTOH either that link was poorly written, or I'm not very good at comprehension. The hypothetical manufacturing scenario was well thought out, but I failed to make the connection. The last paragraph* doesn't seem to fit with the rest, but having read it a few times I'm not really sure what the intent was... ............... * " If members of the audio industry had been seriously interested in investigating the freezing technique further after Robert Harley's article, perhaps now, some 10 years later, more people than Peter Belt would have had to come to the conclusion that the beneficial effect of freezing has nothing to do with `affecting the audio signal' - that there is something else `going on'. This realisation only comes about when one realises that freezing something which could not, by any stretch of the imagination, be associated with the audio system and yet one can obtain a similar beneficial effect on the `sound' !!! " ............... I would hope that by 'going on' s/he means psychological expectation, but who knows? -- Skunk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Skunk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2685 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33615 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
