opaqueice wrote: > >> Robin Bowes] >> Are you seriously questioning whether the Transporter sounds any >> better than the stock Squeezebox (2 or 3) ? > > Yes. Questioning, not stating.
It sounds like another one of your little thought experiments. I mean, are you serious: > I suspect the Transporter was designed like that - SD tried to > produce something with the least possible jitter at the digital out, > the lowest distortion, etc. - all defined by theory and measured with > scopes. My guess is listening tests played a very small role, > because we are talking about differences typically far below the > threshold of audibility. Whether the end product actually sounds any > better than a stock SB is open to question, and same goes for the SB+ "I suspect", "My guess is". And you're the one suggesting everything is the same unless you've ABX'd it. Please, give it a rest. >> Have you even heard a Transporter? > > No. Someday when I have a chance I'll take PhilNYC up on an > invitation; maybe then we can do an ABX with a SB and a Transporter. > >> I find your constant scepticism and bringing up of DBT does indeed >> stifle discussion and makes this board very boring. > > We already had this discussion - there were several threads devoted to > it. For everyone complaining about mentions of DBT there was someone > complaining about endless discussions of ebony pucks. I don't see the > point in rehashing that. No, a turkey won't vote for Christmas, will it? R. _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
