opaqueice;192976 Wrote: > ...you seem to have proven that the Lavry DA10 is [b[not[/b] immune to > input jitter, contrary to the claims of the manufacturer: there is a > clear difference between the SB3+DA10 result and the Terratec+DA10. > > There were recently some debates on another forum over the Lavry - > someone took it apart and concluded that the so-called crystal lock > mode is a sham, and in fact is identical to the narrow mode - just a > decent PLL, but without the fancy re-clocking claimed by Lavry. > > You don't have access to a Benchmark DAC, do you?
Regarding the Lavry dispute, one sure could expect some perfect plot from any digital output, if the product was really and totally immune to jitter. What amount of jitter can be left in order to be recognized as immune to jitter? I don't know. And from what I can see, no other manufacturer seems to be willing to compete with Dan Lavry on the grounds of jitter rejection. And, no, I don't have a Benchmark DAC. Maybe some happy owner of one could run some test? It's not really complicated, and would be very interesting, definetely. JLM -- jlmatrat ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jlmatrat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10656 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34132 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
