Mr_Sukebe;194555 Wrote: 
> Clive,
> I'm a little confused about your point on hypercompression.  I assume
> the issue we're talking about is how so many recent pop CDs have
> everything compressed into a 6-7db volume range.  
> I thought that this would have been completed during mastering, and as
> such would result in it being applied to both CD and LP in the same
> way.  Is this not the case?
The final mastering done for LP and CD releases is radically different.
(As I mentiond in my previous posting, LP mastering requires all sorts
of compromises due to the mechnical limitations of the medium. CD
mastering requires none of these compromises).

The hypercompression which plagues modern pop/rock CDs is completely
incompatible with delivery on vinyl. If such hypercompression were to
be used on a vinyl release, the only way to fit it onto the LP would be
to cut the album at such a low level that: (i) surface noise would be a
terrible problem; and (ii) the LP would be very quiet (which defeats
the purpose of hypercompression in the first place, which is to make
things sound as loud as possible). Therefore the mastering for LP uses
significantly less dynamic range compression than is used for CD.


-- 
cliveb

Performers -> dozens of mixers and effects -> clipped/hypercompressed
mastering -> you think a few extra ps of jitter matters?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34379

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to