> Promotion costs *should* not be recoupable. > Out-of-pocket expenses for promotional purposes, incurred by the artist > *should* be reimbursed by the record company. > The record company *may* provide promotional "tour support" > Video costs are *usually* recoupable by 50%. The remaining 50% is > recovered from commercial exploitation of the video. Note the preponderance of non-committal words (which I have highlighted). The Music For London site appears to be saying what *ought* to happen. But it's not what happens in practice to an awful lot of artists. Someone else has already referred you to Janis Ian's well-known essay on the subject. She's not alone.
-- cliveb Performers -> dozens of mixers and effects -> clipped/hypercompressed mastering -> you think a few extra ps of jitter matters? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34928 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
