mswlogo;206845 Wrote: 
> If you have one digital attentuator what does a 2nd add. Why can't the
> one feed the DAC and the SPDIF?
> 
> What you seem to be talking about is attenuation limits rather than an
> attenuator.
> 
> Your talking about how big a coconut can or needs to be, I'm talking
> about how many.

Since the purpose of the preamp setting is to apply a fixed amount of
attenuation only at the DAC (and not the s/pdif), it is better to use
the (free) hardware attenuator in the DAC than to spend CPU cycles
doing an additional one in software. If it were supposed to apply to
both outputs, then yes we would just use the one attenuator in software
- in that case we would just apply a scaling factor to the existing
volume control. Another reason for doing it in the DAC is that it made
it easy to add the feature without increasing code complexity.

BTW, I personally don't like the preamp setting but I added it because
so many people wanted it. So I agree it's a bit odd and I'm not trying
to defend it, just explaining how it works.


-- 
seanadams
------------------------------------------------------------------------
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35642

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to