Phil Leigh;210347 Wrote: 
> The thing I don't understand/accept is simply this:
> If I can't hear any difference regardless of whether my TACT is 
> actually physically connected between my SB & DAC or not...how can a
> better power supply make the TACT sound better than not being there at
> all? - I mean, when the TACT is in the loop it is still upsampling to
> 96kHz and then going back to 44.1 on output (that is the way I have
> mine set up anyway) even when in bypass mode. The SPDIF stream from the
> SB is obviously not being mangled in a way that affects audio quality by
> the TACT processing, PSU and extra digital cabling.
> 
> 
> I may not be expressing this very well - I could understand the
> argument if I could hear insertion loss (of any sort) with the TACT
> in...but I can't!
> 
> Phil

If you have it upsampling to 96, then it may theoretically be better to
have it output 48, as your DAC should handle this just fine.  Have you
tried this?

(Oh and I agree with your logic on the PSU impact on the Tact, btw. 
Doubtless some would argue that there is some deficiency somewhere that
is clouding the difference, but if you can't hear it, who cares?)

Adam


-- 
adamslim

Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have
others

http://www.last.fm/user/AdamSlim/
'Last.fm group: people who don't listen to any of last.fm's top
artists'
(http://www.last.fm/group/People+who+don%27t+listen+to+any+of+last.fm%27s+top+artists)

SB+, EAR 859, Living Voice Auditorium II plus some other stuff
SB3, Shek d2, Ming-Da MC84-C, Harbeth HL-P3ES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26306

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to