thomsens;212680 Wrote: > > I think the key is addressing the capability and not past > implementations. I'm surprised so much effort was spent discussing the > way CD players did it. Who cares? >
I agree, but the fact that is does not work the same as a CD player has been the overwhelming complaint WRT scanning. That is the point I was trying to answer, and in particular, why it is silly to assert that it should be a trivial feature because a 20-yr old product can do it. Please read the original comment I quoted. If you want to have a discussion about a different mechanism that does not have audible feedback like a CD player, then I think that would be an excellent new direction to explore. > If it's a very tough engineering challenge, then I'd say a mistake was > made during the architectural design of the product. Interesting - can you explain? Are you saying a) network streaming is a useless technology, because it makes scanning difficult. Instead of making a network streamer, Slim Devices should have used an internal hard drive or something. b) scanning is not really difficult to implement in a network streamer (if that is what you're saying, please tell me how you would do it). c) something else? -- seanadams ------------------------------------------------------------------------ seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36446 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
