adamslim;215696 Wrote: > I hate agreeing with Opaqueice. Ok then I won't :) > > Sorry but I have not seen anything that proves that audiodiffmaker (or > any similar measurement-differencer system) is better than the human > ear. Geeez.... I'm going to tell you something that must be very unpleasant to a 'true' audiophile: Your ears are crap and with crap I mean really crap. I mean as crap as crap can be and if your ears aren't that crappy than it's the grey matter between them that's colouring every sound with it's expectations and experience from the past! And that makes your hearing even more crappy... So face it: your hearing is crap!
adamslim;215696 Wrote: > Plus I do not accept that a system that is designed to find such > differences has any relevance to listening to music. It's extremely relevant in this case: If there is no difference, then there is NO difference! The problem with a lot of 'true' audiophiles is that they just need a justification for the large amounts of money they spend on their equipment and that justification is their supposed superb hearing while in reality probably 99.999999999999% of the 'true' audiophiles have as crappy hearing as everyone else... maybe even worse... Did I already mention your hearing is crappy? -- servies ------------------------------------------------------------------------ servies's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9496 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
