opaqueice;221002 Wrote: > There was no attempt to determine which sounded better. This is one of > the standard methodologies in audio testing, and it doesn't introduce > any extraneous questions or mental tasks, so I'm not sure what you're > objecting to.IIRC you specifically mentioned that Phil was unable to reliably identify one source from another - therefore you were expecting him to make a decision based on more than just identifying a difference.
opaqueice;221002 Wrote: > > As for length of test, you've again completely ignored my point, which > is that short tests are demonstrably more sensitive than long ones. But ONLY > to whether A&B are different, not to which is which, which is better, etc etc -- Patrick Dixon www.at-tunes.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=37553 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
