nuhi;230850 Wrote: > muski, oh ok. > > While adjusting the curve to your new comparison I was wondering are > those dBs on the phase response actually degrees or it's more like > divided somehow
No, it's degrees (-180->0->180). (BTW, I have no phase information in either of my mic cal files). It seems like these phase response plots vary a lot depending on the amount of smoothing done. I'll have a look at the other Octave phase plots. >From the DRC documentation, it's not clear how much benefit there is to modifying the phase information. Also, it looks like you need to modify the .drc files to make sure all the MC flags are set correctly. >From http://drc-fir.sourceforge.net/doc/drc.html: > > Starting from version 2.0.0 DRC lets you specify the phase for the > target post filter stage. Phase specification should be placed after > the amplitude specification and should be expressed in degrees. > Following the example above: > 0 -40 0 > 18 -20 45 > 20 0 90 > 20000 0 180 > 21000 -40 90 > 22050 -100 0 > If not specified a value of 0 is assumed. Setting a phase different > than 0, i.e. flat, is useless within normal HiFi systems in almost all > circumstances. Furthermore the phase specification is used only if the > PSFilterType is L, else any phase specification is wiped out by the > minimum phase filter extraction. > Looking forward to doing some listening tests tonight! muske -- muski SB3->Bryston BP25DA->Bryston 4B SST->Wilson Watt Puppy 7 Transporter via XLR->Headroom Max Balanced Headphone Amp->Balanced AKG701s & HD650s ------------------------------------------------------------------------ muski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3670 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38758 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
