harmonic;254200 Wrote: 
> Manufactors and review magazins like stereophil always work together
> dont ever beleive that the reviewers are purly none biased ,  its the
> old if you scratch my back i scratch yours  thing.
> 
> Some independet internet sites review things with a open mind and
> somthims its not very pretty.
> Herer in demark the sb3 was reviewed in a independted hifi site   , the
> said it wassent better then a similar priced dvd player.
> Not that i beleive them  but the point is dont beleive in what you read
> use ,  your ears .
> 
> Have many bad reviews have sterophil ever done ?
> Or  the stereotimes reviewers that strangly always   end up with 
> having the component  the review in there system.
> 
> On of the most expensiv learnings in this crazed hoppy was that  never
> ever buy somthing based  apone the review.
> 
> Somtime back i sold on of my Lyngdorf amps to a person that explained
> to me that  he ones read the stereotimes review of the the same amp, 
> and  decided back then  that based apone   he  fell in love with the
> review  he would  someday try owening one.
> Its was clear that he   was buying the dream and review not the amp
> becaue he had never heard it nor was interresting very much in have it
> sounded.
> 
> 
> 
> The reviews  have huge impact  on the marked, what would happen  if
> sterophil had said   the transporte is a horrible analytical unbareble
> sounding,  neon sign ameerican piece  of worthless junk ?
> Slim would have  sold 80 % less  or  worse closed down.
> Not that its what the think,  but the alwasy try finding what the
> product have going for it and yes slim product measure very good by
> some standard  i personaly couldent care less about.
> But  many people will actually enjoy there system more and be more
> entusiastik  about it if the  can justifi it with somthing like it had
> amazing measurments in stereophil.
> 
> The all sounds the same its all in your mind skeptics considder this a
> shortsigted  victory.
> 
> Thats also proberly why it pisses people of in  a slim forum where most
> people allready are mass hypnoticed byt the Bit perfect, great review
> in stereophil  curse    when it
> got  a bad review  or somone says it sounds to analytical. 
> 
> When i started out i did the exact same thing i analysed the marked and
> placed my money where the reviews sounded best.
> What i ended up with was 4 shunyata anaconda cables, costing 2k each, a
> shunyata hyndra 8 costing 2500, usd  2 lyngdorf 2200 amps one with
> roomperfect  a lyngsord cd.1,  pair  w210 corner subs  gamut l3
> speakers and 10.000 worth of cables.
> What i ended up with  was a horrible analytical bright sound  i
> couldent stand listing to.
> Ironicly  what started this hoppy for  was  hearing sonus faber
> speakers with a linn amp and linn source,    stupendiously i dident buy
> that , i bougt what had a review i loved most.
> 
> Since then  i dont ever pay atension to reviews enymore,  i buy the
> hifi that lights up my hart, and makes my feet tap.

So you are criticizing a magazine that provides OBJECTIVE measurements
because you where foolish enough to rely on SUBJECTIVE reviews and
bought into some snake oil? (no pun intended :)


-- 
riffer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
riffer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13459
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41469

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to