SuperQ;257095 Wrote: > If you are going to make claims of fact without backing it up I'm going > to call bullshit. Now, if you can back it up with original design > requirement specifications I will gladly agree with you. > > I did Google around for a while and found nothing to back up your > claims. I will lookup the Mil-C-17 spec.
There we go, all you had to do was backup your claim. I've done the legwork for you: Best proof I could find: http://www.lowsmoke.com/filecabinet/Coaxial/17-2A.pdf (backed up to my site: http://ben.nerp.net/MIL-C-17-2A.pdf) Inner conductor: Solid, copper-covered, steel wire. Diameter: .0285 inch +/- .0010 You're correct, spec cable MUST be CCS. Thanks, very very good information to know. I will have to remember to update the wikipedia article to refer to the original spec -- SuperQ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SuperQ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2139 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30801 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
