seanadams;264395 Wrote: > I've commented here many times on the role of listening tests in > developing our products. It is a very important skill and there are > many things easily detected by ear that are harder to see in > measurements. Both are important. > > That said, I am not going to give you my own detailed subjective > analysis of Receiver vs SB3, with respect to danceability, boogie, etc. > They both sound excellent to me, but if you are looking for that kind of > commentary to guide your buying decisions, just wait a couple more weeks > for the reviews to start coming in.
Sean....why not? I'm not being a smart ass ;) I am more than interested in your opinion but I do understand how it might not be politically or business correct to offer it. The wonderful thing about the SB3 and all the SD products is that they are very much audiophile grade so these things do matter a lot. I am still, one year later, astonished by the sound from my unmodified SB3. Which is why I am going to be purchasing a Transporter very soon. I also need another unit for a 3rd room and wondered how the two smaller units stack up against each other. But hopefully you will still be offering your 30 day guarantee on the Duet so I can do a comparison myself. Anyway...a very big mahalo for all the countless hours of music pleasure you and all at SD have given us. -- mauidj Oracle Delphi/SME IV/Dynavector, SB3, Krell EVO-555, Krell EVO-202, Krell EVO-402, B&W 801-Matrix3. Music all the way! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mauidj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7648 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=42899 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
