bigfool1956;291994 Wrote: 
> I have four Alecto monoblocks driving my speakers, two per speaker.
> Adding the second pair of amps was a significant upgrade in terms of
> bass control and depth. It also made an (admittedly lesser) improvement
> to the treble, removing a layer of grain.
> 
> When using stereo amps, it is normal to use one amp for the two bass
> sections of the speakers, and one for the two treble sections
> (horizontal). HOWEVER, although many people don't try this, it is
> actually better to use one stereo amp for the left speaker, and the
> other one for the right speaker.
> 
> This way the power supply is only dealing with a single speaker's worth
> of bass delivery, and any crosstalk is kept within the same speaker. 
> 
> Of course, if you decide to go the bi-amping route, then it is trivial
> to try out both arrangements.
> 
> On the question of whether bi-amping is an improvement, per se. That is
> a somewhat different issue. I found that when I had the opportunity to
> use a single pair of Bryston 600W monoblocks (the 7B's if I remember
> correctly), then I found them to be a considerable improvement over the
> two pairs of Alectos.
> 
> In other words, bi-amping is not a universal panacea. It can be a cost
> effective way of upgrading an existing system, if you simply double up
> on you existing power amp(s).
> 
> I would dearly love to compare lower powered bi-amped Brystons with a
> single pair of the 7Bs.
> 
> Active speakers, where each individual frequency range in a speaker is
> driven with a different amp, and where the crossover frequencies are
> controlled electronically prior to the power amps are a very different
> kettle of fish. 
> 
> Just to be clear, although many people view active speakers as
> containing the crossover electronics, and amps within the enclosure,
> widespread use of this topology is quite recent. The term active
> speakers also applies to the topology that has the crossover and all
> the amps in your equipment rack, with multiple speaker cables running
> to each speaker. This is not what is referred to in common audio
> parlance as bi-amping (sorry Pat).

This is malarky. Again physics is the issue. The benefit of bi-amping
is derived from the fact that each amplifier has a fixed range to
reproduce. The net effect is a result of Ohm's law. Unlike evolution,
this is not a theory. 

If you are using a single amp on each channel, you will experience
benefits only because your amp was not capable of running two channels
simultaneously.

Active speakers are a different issue entirely.

Another whole point of bi-amping is the ELIMINATION of passive
crossovers.

Any input Mr. Farrell?


-- 
pski
------------------------------------------------------------------------
pski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15574
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=46354

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to