Not quite sure what you are all driving at here, but IME there is very little to be recorded at elevated frequencies, what there is is very low in level and even then we can't hear it.
I never believed that 24/96 or higher was anything to do with (the need for) capturing high frequencies that aren't there/we cant hear...it was about a more accurate (smoother?) sampling due to a higher sampling rate... However it turns out that what really matters is the ability to correctly resolve micro-dynamics which requires 20 bit+ resolution (rather than higher sampling rates). Most people I know can't hear a difference between 16/44.1 and 16/96. Likewise most people I know CAN hear the difference between 16/44.1 and 24/44.1 YMMV -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good Vibrations S/W - MF X-DAC V3/X-PSU/X-10 buffer (Audiocomm full mods)- Linn 5103 - Linn Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters, Kimber & Chord cables ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49412 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
