Robin Bowes wrote: > I don't think a sample size of three is statistically significant. :)
Laugh, but its weird, at 8 or 9, it can be, depending on the population. You have to have really clear results to get the "reject the null hypothesis" result, but you can do it with under ten. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
