pfarrell;359609 Wrote: 
> Nonreality wrote:
> > pfarrell;357564 Wrote: 
> >> The DAC built into a SB3 is decent, as good as you should expect in
> a
> >> $200 device, after all the SB3 is just a display, cpu and a $200
> DAC.
> > 
> > I really think the most expensive thing in an SB3 is the vacuum
> > display.  I think the dac (just the chip) isn't over $20 US  That's
> not
> > including all the design and other things to make it work they way
> they
> > have.  And they have done a great job with it.  I just think you are
> > way over stating the cost of the actual DAC here.
> 
> Sorry, I meant that an SB3 is a $100 display added to what is a retail
> $200 DAC. I would expect it to sound essentially the same as any
> standalone DAC that retails for $200.
> 
> The actual DAC chip sells for less than a dollar. Its really hard to
> spend more than $3 on DAC chips, no matter how fancy they are.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Pat Farrell
> http://www.pfarrell.com/
I understand what you mean now.  I looked the chip up on a mass
wholesalers site and they were about 13 US if you bought a 1000 I
believe.


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54783

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to