mrthreeplates;485502 Wrote:
> Hi,
> Would someone post the commandline and example output of icedax when
> run on one of these disks with inconsistent TOC/subchannel flags?
>
> I'd love to do this, but I don't know of any discs in my collection
> that are inconsistent.
>
I've noticed 2 in my collection with inconsistencies, but in both cases
icedax corrects twice for no change from the TOC! This one is Musica
Sveciae MSCD 531 (Salonen conducts Berwald Symphonies 3 & 4).
Code:
--------------------
$ icedax -J -D/dev/cdrom
Type: ROM, Vendor 'LITE-ON ' Model 'DVDRW LH-20A1H ' Revision 'LL06' MMC+CDDA
569344 bytes buffer memory requested, 4 buffers, 55 sectors
#icedax version 1.1.9, real time sched., soundcard, libparanoia support
AUDIOtrack pre-emphasis copy-permitted tracktype channels
1- 4 no no audio 2
AUDIOtrack pre-emphasis copy-permitted tracktype channels
5- 7 yes no audio 2
Table of Contents: total tracks:7, (total time 57:12.72)
1.( 8:58.32), 2.( 7:52.43), 3.( 5:26.40), 4.( 6:49.30), 5.(10:56.57),
6.( 9:15.43), 7.( 7:53.52)
Table of Contents: starting sectors
1.( 0), 2.( 40382), 3.( 75825), 4.( 100315), 5.( 131020),
6.( 180277), 7.( 221945), lead-out( 257472)
CDINDEX discid: NoqqViyiz9ojAEWSUV9SdgCLUGo-
CDDB discid: 0x510d6807
CD-Text: not detected
CD-Extra: not detected
Media catalog number: 0601000320004
scanning for ISRCs: 7 ...
index scan: 4...difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis
correcting TOC...
difference: TOC:with, subchannel:without preemphasis
correcting TOC...
difference: TOC:without, subchannel:with preemphasis
correcting TOC...
index scan: 7...
--------------------
Very odd. It corrects twice, so the end result is no difference! One
symphony is on tracks 1-4, and the other is on 5-7, so it would be very
odd if track 4 had no pre-emphasis while tracks 1-3 did.
This other one is Supraphon 10 3471 (Cunning Little Vixen with
Beňačková, disc 2), and it's also a mixed pre-emphasis/no
pre-emphasis CD. Track 1 shows as having no pre-emphasis and icedax
corrects twice just as above.
>
> BTW: Is icedax the same as cdda2wav (part of cdrtools)?
>
Yes, I should have mentioned, it's from a split off of the cdrtools
distribution called cdrkit:
http://www.cdrkit.org/
Here's their rationale for the cdrtools/cdrkit split:
>
> Why cdrkit? Why wodim? Why genisoimage? Because:
>
> - it won't tell you that you have no /dev/pg* device file thing foo,
> that you
> have never seen and you will never need
>
> - it won't require to be executed as root, fail with obscure messages
> without
> such permissions
>
> - it won't force you to wait 3 seconds every time you want to start,
> no matter
> what you specify as gracetime=
>
> - it won't kill another burning process when you do -scanbus in
> another shell
>
> - it will let you specify your device directly in the way you know it,
> rather
> than forcing some weird TARGET,BUS,LUN syntax with weird numbers
>
> - it will not wreak random havoc if you used spaces and not tabs in
> the config file
>
> - genisoimage won't stop accepting the well known option -L in the
> near future
>
> - genisoimage will stop on 2.1GiB large files rather than just
> "forgetting"
> them and let you burn crap
>
> - users are respected and not used as pinballs between us and the OS
> kernel
> developers
>
--
Daverz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34336
_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
