atrocity;490569 Wrote: 
> The amount of streaming data will be the same, but ALAC takes up a bit
> more disk space for stereo files and a *lot* more disk space for mono
> material.  FLAC seems to do a better job of compressing data that's the
> same in both channels.
> 
> Or at least this was true when I was doing some quick 'n' dirty tests a
> year or so back.

Thanks, I ran a few tests of my own, I found the difference in file
size is negligible as yet I have no Mono CD's so unable to test this.

Whilst AIFF is an option, running wireless and now have three players
keeping the files small is probably a priority for me.


-- 
shevans

SB 3, NVA P90sa passive pre-amp, NVA A40 monoblock's, Fostex FE206E
based big purple people eaters!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
shevans's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32505
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71882

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to