AlAz;498164 Wrote: 
> I've just tust try to rip a disc I ripped yesterday with EAC. This time,
> I used RipStation Micro. The result supried me quite a lot. EAC gave me
> a 14,6 MB FLAC file, RipStation gave me a 15,4 MB FLAC file !!!
> 
> So I decided to rip to FLAC (I think I can remember I have read that
> you can have different compression level in FLAC, preserving exactly the
> same file, but at a different CPU cost).
> 
> Surprise !
> 
> * EAC : gives me a track quality of 100%, CRC 4F6D5D8E  \n  13) 
> [CB937414] in report log and a MD5sum of
> 0edc7c88d96f55f5cefe9e50ec4ca46f
> Size is 31893164
> 
> * RipStation Micro gives me a MD5sum of
> c7f4823ab3c75d091bb22feb7b49d290
> Size is 31893164
> 
> * dbPowerAmp says AccurateRip is OK (status "Accurate (13)"), gives me
> a checksum of FE527C89
> Size is 31895456
> 
> What conclusion ? Why the WAV are different ? There are no metadata in
> WAV files...

Keep in mind that to compre checksum, CRC, etc. you must compare audio
CRC only. Every ripper may use different padding within the tags, add
different tags (even in a WAV file), etc. So file sizes could be
different. So your comparison above tells you nothing. See this thread
re using Audio CRC only. 

http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=19704


-- 
garym
------------------------------------------------------------------------
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72916

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to