Stratmangler;499634 Wrote: > EMI did future proof the Beatles remastering project as far as was > possible - see this article > http://www.theinsider.com/news/2102658_Re_Mastering_the_BEATLES_Catalog_The_Process > > I agree that the sample rate seems to be the key to improved audio - > most of the music DVD's that I have are AC3 on the stereo tracks, which > transcodes to 16/48 files. The audio on these discs is better than CD > with no exceptions - perhaps I've been lucky in this respect. > > That said, I've also noted the improvements brought by HDCD when the > files have been ripped using dBPoweramp with the DSP plugins installed. > The resultant files are 24/44.1 . The audio improvements are worth > pursuing. > > Chris:)
It's really not necessary to have anything above 44.1Khz (resolution) and 24bit (dynamic range), unless you can hear sounds over 22Khz. Check the Nyquist theorem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem -- dcolak ------------------------------------------------------------------------ dcolak's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5864 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72852 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
