michael123 wrote: > regarding silly sampling rates, tell it to Linn, Lindberg, Classic > Records and others, ok?
As P T Barnum said, no one has ever gone broke underestimating the intellegence of the American public. I have no problem with 88.2/24 or 96/24. I can't hear it, but I can believe it could be better. But I can't see any possible theoretical improvement for twice that rate. None. I have more than 30 microphones in my recording studio. None of them claim any response over 20kHz. They might have something over 20.0 kHz, but its going to have at least a 6 dB per octave rolloff, and more are more likely to have a 24 dB per octave rolloff. The point of higher rates is to avoid the brick wall filters needed at 22 kHz for redbook. You do that fine with 88.2 or 96 kHz. > Working with Wave files on the server reduces the load on the > Transporter. What are you talking about? There are no "wave" files that are more than RedBook. You can have PCM files at any rate/size you want, but it is not going to make it actually sound better. > >> Give it up. >> >> You have become a troll. And your SeanTrollScore for these recent posts >> is 0/10. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76315 You can't get a negative score on the SeanTrollScore, but we may have to change the rules just for you. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
