bhaagensen wrote: > by now these forums are swamped with claims that the digital output of > the Touch is better than the SB3/Receiver and almost on par with the > Transporter.
Which is completely consistent with the time. The SB3 is just a SB2 in a better looking case. Its an ancient design using ancient DAC chips. If the Touch was not a lot better, I'd be gobsmacked. > I have without luck been trying to track down these 'mother'-posts for > hours now. I'm guessing John S and Phil L are involved, but even this > haven't been of any help. You have the right sources. But I don't keep the email archives, and I hate using the Forum software, so I can't help you there. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
