pfarrell;560318 Wrote: > > Would not think that it would take much > > to continue it's evolution and I sure would guess that it was > > successful. > > Are you serious? Its old platform, it would have to be completely > redesigned from the ground up to use the current platform. > > It was a fun lark for Sean and Dean, but never sold in any volume, and > > was too "computer" for the audiophile purists, and too high priced for > > consumers. > > Suppose someone wanted to make a TP-2, it would be what percent > "better" > than the initial TP, in what area would you put the engineering? > > He's dead, Jim > > > -- > Pat Farrell > http://www.pfarrell.com/
Interesting perspective. I do not know the difference between platforms, sorry. What is this? Do you know that it did not sell in volume or is this your assumption? Not a loaded question at all Pat. I don't know either way, just have my own assumption. I disagree with your statement about the "audio purist" however. My personal experience, with many, is that they more than excepted it and had been pretty much embraced...me included. I do not have any notion on how to improve it but would guess that the dac could be as well as the analog section. What that involves is beyond my knowledge base but certainly it can be done. Dan Wrights changes to the analog section certainly were well received. -- richardw ------------------------------------------------------------------------ richardw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32135 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=80282 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
