ncarver;577334 Wrote: > And another favored debating technique is to claim you never said > something that you did. Ho, hum. Just the kind of response I > expected. You clearly stated that Dan's Strad comments were "quite > right," of course disagreeing with me after I said that he "does not > exactly have his facts correct." Now I have rebutted a number of his > claims with detailed evidence and all Ron can do is whine that I am not > arguing fairly. I will let the evidence I posted speak for itself: > there have not been multiple tests with concert violinists, the tests > that have been done lack scientific validity, the results even from > these poor tests have not been at the level of chance, and it is > extremely unlikely that a trained listener would not be able to "tell > the difference between" (Dan's words) two different violins. Hard to > see what is left that is "quite right" in Dan's Strad statement, but > people are obviously free to believe whatever nutty thing they want to > believe. > > No more for me here--promise I will not look at this thread again. So > say any rubbish you want Ron. Others can PM me if they want more info > from my search. Please take a look at the violin maker's site!
I bet your PM is just filling up. -- Nonreality -IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.- HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81616 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
