soundcheck;584137 Wrote: > >> You "hearing" an improvement or even a difference is not a "hard > fact" unless the difference can be measured, now that would be a "hard > fact". > > Wrong! > > People who buy 200$ devices usually have to trust their ears. > > Those ears are known to be better on many aspects then most of the > measurement gear out there - especially when it comes to low > level details and distortions. > > If several people independently experience the same result. I call it > hard facts. > > Opinions as expressed over here more then often are worth nothing. > > I wouldn't state anything over here or anywhere else, what I couldn't > prove in a listening session.
I'm sure you believe this all to be true. Unfortunately your definition of "fact" versus "opinion" is the complete opposite of what is generally accepted. Do you REALLY believe that what we think we hear is "fact"? Do you REALLY believe that we cannot measure everything that we can hear? (I'm not asking if you think we can make sense of what we can measure - that's a totally different question and is actually what I believe to be the real issue we should be discussing...) -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=81454 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
