Wombat;623051 Wrote: > > I don´t like upsampling as healing as some make it look. If you have > to, using 96kHz has more headroom and most likely the output filter of > your DAC kicks in later as on 88.2kHz > > To the quality of the different resamplers i think there are several > these days that do more or less the same math. You just have to decide > what is more important to you. Lowering BW and allowing aliasing gives > you less pre-echo, using maximum BW always will give you strong > pre-echo. You theoreticaly can archieve all results inbetween if the > resampler program gives you the option to. There is no magic. > But be aware that this pre-echo you see on these funny graphs happens > above the lopwass frequency, so it may look bad on paper but you can´t > hear it.
Sounds like you have dabbled in upsampling Wombat and know a thing or two about it. Cool. What do you use at the moment...do you just go with native redbook or upsample in your own setup. thanks. -- Gazjam ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84462
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
