Wombat;638260 Wrote: 
> Tough writing you did there. Next is to convince Mr. Atkinson or parts
> of his team for a real DBT between this unit and the Touch. Next test
> will be Hires against properly downsampled... :)
> I remember him argueing in a thread on Hydrogenaudio about the evils
> and audio compression. If i remember right (very long thread) he did
> showcases with Hires files against lossy, sighted and pretty
> prejudiced. The answer if he ever DBtested anything he mentions there
> is still open afaik. One other thing is a sample he uses for eficiently
> showing the advantage of 24bit recordings consists of pure noise in bits
> 17-24... If interest i can try to dig that thread out.

Noise, yeah Stereophile is pretty familiar with noise since noise is
about all one gets when it comes to their coverage of digital audio. In
spite of Mr. Atkinson's belief that Stereophile does a super job in
their coverage of digital audio I've yet to see even one review of a
high resolution download from any of the various vendors (Linn, HDTT,
HDTracks, etc.). And now they are busy touting the superiority of
176.4kHz and 192kHz over 88.2kHz and 96kHz! As I said, pure, unfiltered
noise.


-- 
ralphpnj

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels -> Snatch -> The Transporter ->
Transporter 2 (oops) -> Touch

'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88364

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to