> Little did they know they were *also* measuring a curvature of > space/time! FTFY. ;) Light doesn't seem to stop being particles the instant you start regarding it as waves, and (The) reality doesn't stop being objective the instant you realize it's elusive and has many face(t)s. But of course I can't prove that, so you're probably right we've come full circle (which btw has a constant pi if and only if the circle exists in an idealized flat/static space, something which you'll never find in the objectively real (curved) universe).
The uncertainty principle only conserns itself with the limits of measuring reality AFAIU, not the limits of reality itself. Mnyb Wrote: > there will be a difference or no difference in soundquality without a > human observer too There are two widespread definitions of "sound". The one equating sound to pressure waves is more objective than the one requiring someone to hear it for it to be a sound. But it is the second one that is most useful in real life. For instance, if you use the first definition, then silence doesn't exist (except an ideal vacuum - which doesn't exist). "If a tree falls in the woods, and no one is around to hear it ..." -- Soulkeeper -that is not dead which can eternal lie. and with strange aeons even death may die.- touch (sans caps) + duet + boom + radio (portable) / dd-wrt on linksys wrt160n / sbs 7.6 on w7(x86) with avira free ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soulkeeper's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35297 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88345 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
