Jeff Flowerday;675253 Wrote: > Being able to turn off the WiFi radio on the touch would make a big > difference. > > I'm wondering on the reduction of pollution from other wired devices on > the network/switch. Or increase with a wifi radio being in the bridge > and polluting the touch via ethernet.
Yes, would the benefit of turning off WiFi in the Touch be offset by introducing a potentially polluting radio in the bridge? In my system, the net benefit seems to be positive. But I defer to folks more knowledgeable than I for any speculation about this. Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge -> Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP--83 Universal Player; Squeezebox Touch (digital out) -> Cambridge Azur 840C DAC -> Adcom GFP-750 preamp -> Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp -> Martin Logan SL3 speakers DSpeaker Antimode 8033 equalizer -> REL T1 Subwoofer BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out) -> Little Dot Mk III amp -> AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch -> Grado SR125 headphones ------------------------------------------------------------------------ guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
