HumanMedia;678603 Wrote: 
> Observations on the process priorities we are configuring in the tt
> file.
> 
> For me, after editing the changes into the tt file, saving and
> rebooting:
> 1. Setting the watchdog priority to 0 in the file (PRIOWATCHDOG=0) does
> nothing and the priority remains 99 (setting it to 1 works tho)
> 2. Same with setting PRIOIRQ37=0, IRQ remains with a priority of 40
> after restart regardless (setting it to 1 works tho)
> 3. pdflush 154 & 155 - why is my sound better if I set these to zero?
> maybe flushing the cache as fast as possible isn't optimal? 
> 
> Thoughts
> FYI my goals are to get the music through with the least amount of
> interference by the SBT.
> What Im worried about is that these tweaks are being guided to
> compensate for tonal imbalances elsewhere our systems, by adding energy
> (most likely jitter, power supply noise or distortion of the digital
> waveform) which affects parts of the frequency range downstream.  IMO
> these process values should be all about reducing these aspects first
> not unwittingly making them worse for quick tonal changes.
> 
> All of these current tweaks are also based around the TT3 default core
> process priorities. Im wondering if there could be a far better 'chord'
> of base process priorities to tweak around?
> Also wondering if the base set of process priorities can be determined
> from a scope waveform to get the cleanest digital signal first, with
> the least jitter and waveform skew, to determine the baseline - then
> fine tune by ear?
> 
> And what specific settings can be agreed on by all? - it appears that
> shutting down all unused processes has a positive effect for all? and
> its just the priority relationship between the essential processes that
> needs to be explored?
> 
> And which are the absolutely non-essential processes for the optimal
> SBT audio file/stream playback?
> And then are some processes non-essential for playback, but equate to a
> better signal and sound if they actually are running (watchdog)?

1. chrt -o -p 0 13 required, I get more detail.
2. this was the first setting I set to 0, it is the usb process, again
require chrt -o -p 0 ??, made a difference to me and this started the
whole priority setting mods.
3. pdflush at 0 on my system is not as detailed or revealing as at fifo
98, I am judging that this is a good thing as it produces outrageous
levels of detail in my system. the effect of this is that compressed cd
sources, modern cds that are engineered loud and bad recordings really
sound bad, while good airy cds and hirez make it sound like the
musicians are in the same room. 

anyway this is a toolkit and you can have super revealing and forward
sound or something more relaxed, less detail and more tolerant of
different quality of sources, I prefer the former.

here are the differences I get

buffer - how revealing do you want the sound ? 3200 most revealing
pdflush - how forward and detailed do you want the sound ? 98 ok for
me, 99 too much
irq14 and irq47 - what balance do you want between bass, mid and top,
found 39 for both ok for me, higher equals more bias towards bass.
tried setting watchdog to fifo 30, but this gave a smoother less
detailed sound, not convinced, Soundcheck also recommended setting it
to 0 - not sure if he still advises it.

my system tends towards a lean sound thanks to the dac, but is already
very dynamic, so rather than adding energy I would suspect that on less
resolving systems the sound may sound flat. all hi fi is about
compromise and each component has its own influence. my aim was to get
as neutral and detailed, but listenable sound as possible. not sure how
jitter can be introduced with these settings ass that is a function of
SBT hardware.

hope this helps


-- 
SBGK
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBGK's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=52003
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=91322

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to